Response to the Stockholm Peace Research Institute 2010 Report

  • Fernando Chavarro Miranda Universidad de los Andes
  • Manfred Grautoff Universidad de los Andes
Keywords: military spending, social spending, defense, taxation

Abstract

This paper seeks to prove empirically and theoretically how military spending represents an externality with respect to growth, as well as the level of impact and productivity that military spending generates with respect to economic growth.

It starts from Paul Samuelson's postulates, and leads to what is called "The efficient frontier", which shows how social spending is affected by defense and security spending, demonstrating how in Colombia this postulate is not fulfilled. To conclude that the defense and security policy is an illusion subject to the conjuncture and the political cycle, and that as long as it is not regulated and isolated from the ups and downs of public opinion, the sustainability of the security and defense policy will be altered, largely due to the lightness with which the analysis of these documents is approached.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernando Chavarro Miranda, Universidad de los Andes

PhD. Businees Administration de Maastrich University, Paises Bajos; Doctor en Administración Estratégica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Perú, Perú; Magíster en Economía, Universidad de Los Andes; Especialista en Investigación, Universidad Santo Tomás; Especialista en Finanzas, Universidad del Rosario; Economista, Universidad de La Salle; Asesor de la Escuela de Inteligencia y Contrainteligencia, Brigadier General Ricardo Charry Solano; Investigador Universidad Juan de Castellanos, Colombia.

Manfred Grautoff, Universidad de los Andes

Economista, Universidad Santo Tomás, Magíster en Economía, Universidad de los Andes, Magíster en Defensa y Seguridad Nacionales. Colombia.

How to Cite
Chavarro Miranda, F., & Grautoff, M. (2017). Response to the Stockholm Peace Research Institute 2010 Report. Perspectives in Intelligence Journal, 9(18), 49–57. Retrieved from https://revistascedoc.com/index.php/pei/article/view/71

References

Barro, R.J. (1974). Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82: 1095-1117.

Barro, R.J. (1979). On the Determination of the Public Debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87: 940-971.

Barro, R.J. (1986). U.S. De cits since WorldWar II. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88: 195-222.

Barro, R.J. (1987). Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices and Budget De cits in the United Kingdom, 1701-1918. Journal of Monetary Economics, 20: 221-247.

Barro, R.J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget De cits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3: 37-54.

Barro, R.J. (1995). Optimal Debt Management. NBER Working Paper, 5327.

Barro, R.J. (1997). Optimal Management of Indexed and Nominal Debt. NBER Working Paper, 6197.

Barro, R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223-51, University of Chicago Press.

Feder, G. (1983). On exports and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 12, 59-73.

Feder, G. (1986). Growth in semi-industrial countries: A statistical analysis, in: H.B.

Grautoff, M., & Chavarro, F. (2009). Análisis del gasto militar desde la perspectiva de la economía de la defensa: el caso colombiano 1950-2006. Ecos de Economía, 28, 199-237, Universidad Eafit.

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65-94.

Samuelson, P. (1979). Economics. 10th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Samuelson, P. (1954). Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure. Quarterly Journal Economic.

Published
2017-12-15
Section
Intelligence and Counterintelligence